Solutions and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are reviving these types of systems. By lie diagnosis tools tested at the border to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being made use of in asylum applications. This article explores Visit Website how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs all their capacity to get around these systems and to pursue their legal right for protection.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering all of them from getting at the programs of safety. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are regimented by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: whilst they assist with expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult for the purpose of refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions manufactured by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top